As the Akpabio led administration draws to a close, it has been observed that tongues have been wagging and ink is being spilled on every platform to create a defaming image of the leader of the administration and this expression of disapproval and giving of opinions about the administration’s faults and qualities by critics have now given rise to side talks, oppositions and enmity between the administration and her close allies.
As far as politics is concerned, there is no perfect system where everybody’s wish is granted, but as long as a majority of the populace is satisfied with the developmental strides and benefits of democracy, we can then say that democracy is justified. This is not to say however, that fair and accurate judgments about the qualities of such administration should not be made to promote the variety of options necessary for a true democracy.
More recently, the administration is criticized for not keeping the promise of building industries and as such, not offering employment to the masses as promised initially and I say, “what about the fulfilled promises?” Days ago, a local tabloid reported the activities of the state cinema complex (Ibom Tropicana) to be prostitution and ‘trade by barter’ (money in exchange for body). While other critics have complained that good roads are only found at the Governor’s home base, others have yet submitted that the state leader’s reckless spending has or will ruin the state financial institution (Akwa Savings and Loans).
To address these issues, one must be candid and honest to his/herself about the rationale behind this purported spending. We have seen with our eyes, the outcome of the Governor’s spending and despite the rumors that the state’s money is being lavished extravagantly, we still have evidences to prove our loyalty to him. Yes, the Governor spends too much as said but is there any politician who does not spend? The radical conclusion that the Governor’s reckless spending has or will ruin Akwa Savings is a very wrong statement. This is in line with the fact that dialogue, which is the most important tool for resolving conflicts, has been downplayed on the altar of image-dampening. Since the management of Akwa Savings knew about its state, why did they have to wait for as long as three years before opening up?
Regarding the usage of Ibom Tropicana for prostitution, I submit that there has always been the abuse of objects and events as we have the child abuse today. A person who has been used to old clothing will surely transform a newly acquired one to the ones he has. Such is the case with the cinema complex. The purpose for its creation has been abused due to lack of discipline, self-control and the discovery of an assumed ‘new market’ by the ‘marketers’. To lay the blame of this mess on the administration is far beyond fairness and justice because this was not the objective of its creation.
What beats me more is the idea that ‘if it’s not me then nobody else can do it’. Perhaps, the people who really think they can fair better than the present administration should be given a chance to prove their worth but I know they will not go beyond their comfort zones (if at all they get there). If anyone has a problem with the Governor or his administration, it should be discussed maturely rather than being grudged in minds only to be throwed-up disgustingly. There is no law against constructive criticism and disagreement except no better solution can be proffered on the issue on ground.
It is sad that many of these critics are those who, out of their selfish interest want to tarnish the good image of the administration because I know that the general public lacks the resources and capability to conceive opinions that are educated enough to be taken seriously. Thus, the abundance and fervent promotion of such opinions merely confuses and complicates political matters that are either easily understood or should be discussed only by those with sufficient intelligence.
On this note, I salute the Governor’s ability to fulfill basic promises while encouraging him to do what’s left before he exits the stage, even in the face of criticism. Eyes have been made to see through this administration that the election of individuals, instead of ideas disrupts democracy which has ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention.
Soon, this tenure will be over and we will have another batch of leaders. We are watching and waiting to see what will become of them, especially those whose accusing fingers are pointing at this administration. We should learn to appreciate things done by others while preparing ourselves for our own visitation. Like our people will say “Adouk ntong ken tong akene” (The dust follows the one who throws it), criticize if you must, but do not throw decency to the dogs.
No comments:
Post a Comment